ArticleBMJ open2026
"I would like to know what happened to me": coerced and involuntary sterilisation of women seeking asylum in the USA.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesInvoluntary sterilisation, the non-consensual medical control of an individual's fertility, is recognised by the WHO, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and UN Women as a serious human rights violation and form of gender-based violence. Survivors of involuntary sterilisation who can prove they were sterilised in their countries of origin have a legal path to asylum in the USA. This study aims to describe the experiences of women seeking asylum in the USA who were subjected to involuntary sterilisation in their countries of origin.
designSemistructured, first-person interviews.
settingA New York City-based medical human rights programme.
participants14 adult women who experienced involuntary sterilisation at an average age of 27 years old in their countries of origin (79% from Honduras, 14% from Guatemala, 7% from Mexico) before applying for protected immigration status in the USA.
resultsInductive qualitative analysis identified common themes across participants including shared experiences of discrimination due to race/ethnicity, exposure to lifelong violence in women's home countries, involuntary sterilisation during antepartum and intrapartum care, lack of informed consent, psychological symptoms, delayed discovery, an appreciation for more responsive healthcare in the USA and a desire to have additional children. Of note, only 43% of participants were aware that they had been sterilised and were therefore eligible for asylum when they entered the USA. 71% of participants had been granted protected status in the USA at the time of interview; 29% were engaged in the asylum process.
conclusionsThe results of the study can inform clinicians about the impact of involuntary sterilisation, heighten awareness of this violation in the context of gender-based violence as a nexus for asylum and advance advocacy in healthcare and policy. Results suggest women would benefit from more comprehensive screening for involuntary sterilisation before and during the asylum process, as well as culturally-responsive and trauma-informed support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.