Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41638622›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2026

MsTargetPeaker: A Quality-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Peak Identification in Targeted Proteomics.

Chi Yang, Yung-Chin Hsiao, Chi-Ching Lee, Lichieh Julie Chu, Ta-Sen Yeh, Ping-Chang Cheng, Petrus Tang, Jau-Song Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chi YangMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Electronic address: chiyang@mail.cgu.edu.tw.
Yung-Chin HsiaoMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Chi-Ching LeeDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Genomic Medicine Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Lichieh Julie ChuMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Ta-Sen YehDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ping-Chang ChengMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Petrus TangMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Parasitology, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Molecular Infectious Disease Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Jau-Song YuMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Research Center for Food and Cosmetic Safety, College of Human Ecology, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Electronic address: yusong@mail.cgu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted mass spectrometry enables precise peptide quantification by identifying high-quality chromatographic peaks for area integration. Automated peak identification remains challenging, particularly for low-abundance targets, because of interference and noise. Existing approaches typically rely on two supervised learning models, one for selecting peak regions and the other for performing downstream quality control in a separate postprocessing step. However, deferring quality assessment to a separate stage may limit the ability to refine peak boundaries in pursuit of improved quality, as the initial selection is performed without explicit awareness of quality-related criteria. In this study, we present MsTargetPeaker, a quality-aware search procedure for identifying peak regions in targeted proteomics data. The method employs a reinforcement learning agent to guide Monte Carlo tree search to efficiently explore chromatograms and localize target peaks while minimizing interference. Peak quality is dynamically assessed during the search via a custom-designed reward function, which prioritizes regions with desirable peak characteristics and enables accurate and robust boundary determination. The reward function further incorporates cross-sample consensus profiles of candidate boundaries to improve the identification of low-quality or ambiguous signals. These innovations support fine-grained peak identification, enhancing both peak quality and quantification precision. In addition, the transparent reward calculation allows MsTargetPeaker to generate interpretable diagnostic quality reports, providing comprehensive metrics across transitions, peak groups, and sample replicates. This facilitates efficient detection of problematic cases for manual curation. Collectively, MsTargetPeaker offers a practical advancement toward robust and automated peak identification in targeted proteomics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProteomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsMass SpectrometryMonte Carlo MethodPeptidesReinforcement Machine LearningPeptidesdeep reinforcement learningMonte Carlo tree searchmultiple reaction monitoringparallel reaction monitoringpeak identificationtargeted mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID41638622
PMCPMC12966724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.