ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026
Influence of different malocclusion traits on overall orthodontic treatment duration.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify pretreatment malocclusion traits that may influence treatment duration and to assess the correlation between these factors and overall treatment duration. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1430 patients who completed orthodontic treatment between July 2013 and March 2022. A comprehensive evaluation of patient records was conducted, and data related to the initial malocclusion and its associated traits were extracted, including 13 parameters such as Angle's classification, overjet, overbite, open bite, and crowding. Results: Severe overjet (>9 mm) and reverse overjet were significantly associated with longer treatment duration. Increased overbite was also associated with longer treatment duration, with deep impinging overbite requiring an additional 6 months compared with an average overbite (P < .001). Bilateral posterior crossbite significantly increased mean treatment duration by 4.76 months (P < .001). Additionally, a midline shift > 3 mm was associated with a 2.3-month increase in mean treatment duration (P = .009). Conclusions: Severe malocclusion traits including increased overjet, reverse overjet, deep overbite, and open bite were strongly linked to longer treatment duration. Similarly, crowding, crossbites, and midline shifts also contributed to extended treatment duration. The presence of missing or impacted teeth, particularly impacted canines and central incisors, led to significant delays in treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.