ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
PTSD symptoms moderate the effects of interpretation bias modification on hostile interpretation bias and trait anger.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with heightened anger tend to interpret ambiguous situations as hostile, maintaining their anger. Importantly, both hostile interpretation bias and anger have been linked to detrimental outcomes such as substance use disorders and suicide. Hostile interpretation bias modification (IBMH) has been found to efficaciously reduce hostile attribution bias, but findings have been mixed on its ability to reduce anger. One factor that may contextualize these findings are symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which have been found to be associated with both hostile interpretation bias and anger. PTSD symptoms were examined as a potential moderator of the effect of IBM-H in sample of trauma-exposed smokers elevated in anger (N = 76). IBM-H was compared to a health and relaxation video control. Among participants elevated (i.e., +1SD) in baseline PTSD symptoms, IBM-H saw significantly lower trait anger following treatment compared to control, though there was no effect of condition on anger in individuals low in PTSD symptoms. Further, among individuals high in PTSD symptoms, changes in hostile interpretation bias fully mediated the effect of IBM-H on anger. These findings provide preliminary support that IBM-H for anger may be most efficacious for those elevated in PTSD symptoms. However, the generalizability of these findings are limited given the sample consisted of trauma-exposed smokers who wished to quit smoking. Future research should examine the efficacy of IBM-H for anger in individuals with PTSD (both smoker and non-smokers) and for secondary outcomes such as substance use disorders, depression, and PTSD symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.