ReviewArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2025
Double-seronegative neuromyelitis optica: it is not possible to interrupt treatment after 10 years of stability.
Review in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- To stop or not to stop: the clinical dilemma of long-term double-seronegative neuromyelitis optica therapy.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a severe autoimmune demyelinating disease characterized by a high risk of relapse and disability. In cases positive for aquaporin 4-immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG), long-term immunosuppression is the established standard. However, the management of double-seronegative NMOSD remains controversial due to limited data. Although some authors propose treatment discontinuation in patients with prolonged remission, there are no reliable predictors of sustained disease inactivity. Given the unpredictability and severity of the relapses, even after a decade of stability, and the lack of robust evidence supporting safe cessation, we argue that maintenance immunotherapy should remain the standard of care in most cases. The risks of disease reactivation outweigh the potential benefits of treatment withdrawal. Until validated biomarkers or clinical tools for individualized risk stratification emerge, the default approach should prioritize sustained disease suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.