In one paragraphObservational study in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
25 authors.
Clarice ListikUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7660-3970 Eduardo ListikUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-8282 Flávia de Paiva Santos RolimUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8051-4738 Miriam Carvalho SoaresUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3725-4464 Renata Montes Garcia BarbosaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-3814-691X Bernardo Assumpção de MonacoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2475-9228 Tamine CapatoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4235-4141 Pedro Renato de Paula BrandãoHospital Sírio Libanês, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Brasília DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1191-2078 Igor Vilela BrumUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9310-3225 Ananda FalconeUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4279-9634 Julia Carvalhinho Carlos de SouzaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-5037 Sara Carvalho Barbosa CasagrandeUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7735-0701 João Carlos Papaterra LimongiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1684-0154 Fernanda Martins Maia CarvalhoHospital Geral de Fortaleza, Departamento de Neurologia, Centro de Distúrbios do Movimento, Fortaleza CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6548-7268 Carlos Roberto de Mello RiederUniversidade Federal Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2950-7211 Egberto Reis BarbosaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6996-9130 Daniel Ciampi de AndradeUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-632X Rubens Gisbert CuryUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-3327 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment for dystonia, with most trials conducted in developed countries. Data from developing countries like Brazil are limited.To evaluate the landscape of DBS for dystonia in Brazil, assessing motor outcomes compared with the existing literature.A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted via medical record review. Demographics and motor outcomes were collected and analyzed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) from patients across four of Brazil's five macro-regions.The cohort included 60 patients (44.3% female), with DBS primarily targeting the globus pallidus internus (73.3%) or subthalamic nucleus (18.3%). The BFMDRS motor scores decreased from 63.0 ± 26.2 (n = 24) at baseline to 36.7 ± 24.6 at 1-year post-DBS (n = 22,
Indexed as
Deep Brain StimulationDystoniaAdultBrazilFemaleGlobus PallidusHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult
Identifiers
PMID41638250
PMCPMC12872318
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390