Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637884›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews2026

Preclinical abuse potential testing using behavioral economics and drug self-administration demand-curve analysis: A strategy to improve resolution of drug stratification for regulatory control.

Matthew L Banks, S Stevens Negus, Neil B Varshneya, Chad J Reissig, Dominic Chiapperino, Justin C Strickland, Derek D Reed, Steven R Hursh, David N Kearns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Intermittent and extended cocaine access attenuate cocaine-vs-food choice in male and female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew L BanksDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia. Electronic address: mbanks7@vcu.edu.
S Stevens NegusDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia. Electronic address: ssnegus@vcu.edu.
Neil B VarshneyaCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Chad J ReissigCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Dominic ChiapperinoCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Justin C StricklandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Derek D ReedInstitutes for Behavior Resources, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
Steven R HurshDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Institutes for Behavior Resources, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
David N KearnsDepartment of Psychology, American University, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: kearns@american.edu.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New chemical entities (NCEs) that act on the central nervous system are synthesized in pharmaceutical drug development programs for investigational purposes or by clandestine laboratories for illicit purposes. One component in the regulatory evaluation process of any NCE is abuse potential assessment, which involves both preclinical and human laboratory experiments to compare a NCE with an established and validated positive control that has known abuse potential in humans. Although multiple procedures are available in both preclinical and human laboratories, this review has focused on preclinical drug self-administration procedures because these results are heavily weighted in the regulatory evaluation process. Preclinical drug self-administration procedures have demonstrated high predictive validity for human abuse potential, and procedures that use simple fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement, as recommended by the current U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance, have good sensitivity for detecting drug reinforcement and abuse potential. However, these procedures have displayed poor resolution for ranking NCEs along an abuse-potential continuum that may inform controlled substance schedule placement. This review discusses the utility of behavioral economic/demand-curve experimental designs as a method to improve the resolution for differentiating relative reinforcing strength across drugs and ranking abuse potential for considerations of regulatory control. Theoretical benefits of demand-curve analysis are considered, and experimental parameters that optimize those benefits are reviewed. The influence of chronic drug exposure and history on demand-curve metrics of drug reinforcing strength and abuse potential is also reviewed. Future directions are highlighted toward empirically determining the utility of behavioral economic approaches for preclinical abuse potential assessment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Simple fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement have good sensitivity for detecting drug reinforcement and abuse potential but have poor resolution for ranking chemical entities along an abuse-potential continuum. Behavioral economic/demand-curve approaches maybe a method to increase resolution for abuse potential assessment. Accordingly, a preclinical abuse potential algorithm incorporating both simple fixed-ratio schedules and behavioral economic/demand-curve methods is described. Finally, the manuscript describes how individual subject traits and state variables, including chronic drug exposure and history, impact behavioral economic metrics of drug abuse potential.

Indexed as

Economics, BehavioralSubstance-Related DisordersAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansSelf AdministrationUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID41637884
PMCPMC12994735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.