ArticleTranslational oncology2026
AlphaMissense pathogenicity scores predict response to immunotherapy and enhances the predictive capability of tumor mutation burden.
Article in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) is a widely used biomarker for selecting cancer patients for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, TMB alone has limited predictive power, as it fails to account for the functional impact of mutations. We introduce AlphaTMB, a composite biomarker that integrates the quantity of mutations (TMB) with the qualitative assessment of their pathogenicity using AlphaMissense, a deep learning model that predicts the deleteriousness of missense variants. Using a pan-cancer cohort of 1,662 patients from the MSK-IMPACT study who received ICI therapy, we computed three scores per patient: TMB, Alpha (sum of AlphaMissense scores), and AlphaTMB (product of TMB and Alpha). Patients were stratified using both cancer-specific and pan-cancer quantiles. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for cancer type, age, and ICI regimen. AlphaTMB showed strong correlation with TMB (Spearman ρ = 0.866, p < 0.001), but offered improved prognostic accuracy. Patients in the bottom 80% AlphaTMB group had significantly poorer survival than those in the top 10% (HR < 2.51, p < 0.001), outperforming TMB and Alpha alone. AlphaTMB reclassified borderline cases, identifying subsets with low TMB but high deleterious mutation load, and vice versa. Gene mutation heatmaps and co-occurrence analysis confirmed that to 10% AlphaTMB-high tumors were enriched in mismatch repair and POLE mutations, reflecting a neoantigen-rich, immunotherapy-responsive phenotype. AlphaTMB improves survival prediction beyond TMB alone, better captures immunogenic tumor profiles, and reflects more accurate patient stratification. This AI derived somatic mutations pathogenicity scoring represents a step toward personalized immuno-oncology and merits further validation in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.