ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2026
Voice-Assisted Technology for People With Parkinson's Disease Experiencing Speech and Voice Difficulties: Co-Designing Solutions Using Design Thinking.
Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile smart speakers are emerging as a novel health care technology, people with Parkinson's Disease (PwPD) and speech and language therapists (SaLTs) have reported difficulties using smart speakers with speech and voice impairments in research. To date, PwPD have identified frustration with having to repeat themselves to be understood, devices timing out before they had finished speaking, and being unable to have a conversation with smart speakers. SaLTs have reported technical and practical challenges in implementing voice-assisted technology tools. Both PwPD and SaLTs indicated a lack of knowledge about what smart speakers could do, as well as concerns about privacy and the listening nature of the devices.
objectiveThis study aims to co-design solutions that support the use of smart speakers for speech and voice difficulties experienced by PwPD.
methodsBased on the Design Thinking framework, a multistage design process was conducted, involving a lay steering group and 2 online co-design workshops. Twenty participants, including PwPD, carers, SaLTs, design and technology experts, and third-sector staff, collaborated during the co-design workshops. The ideate phase included brainstorming and ranking, and conventional content analysis was used to specify prototypes.
resultsTwo main prototypes were created: (1) education and guidance, including privacy and therapeutic usage guides for PwPD and SaLTs to address troubleshooting and delivery considerations; and (2) new speech and language therapy (SLT)-specific features for smart speakers. Participants provided feedback on their experiences of co-design, highlighting feeling valued, the balance of perspectives, and making improvement suggestions. Feedback aligned with the UK standards for public involvement.
conclusionsSmart speakers could enhance accessibility, therapy engagement, and long-term speech outcomes, offering scalable, cost-effective solutions to support SLT services, patient independence, and reduced service demand. Smart speaker solutions with a SLT focus enable PwPD to self-manage speech and voice difficulties at home and reinforce therapy gains between clinic visits. Co-designed with users, these prototypes are intended to address health disparities and relieve pressure on SLT services, offering a scalable and sustainable solution that enhances efficiency and supports ongoing rehabilitation within health care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.