Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637726›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2026

Attractor-Based Models for Sequences and Pattern Generation in Neural Circuits.

Juliana Londono Alvarez, Katherine Morrison, Carina Curto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juliana Londono AlvarezDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Katherine MorrisonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639, USA Katie.Morrison@unco.edu.
Carina CurtoDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.

Funding

Emergent dynamics from network connectivity: a minimal modelR01EB022862 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CURTO, CARINA · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural circuits in the brain perform a variety of essential functions, including input classification, pattern completion, and the generation of rhythms and oscillations that support functions such as breathing and locomotion. There is also substantial evidence that the brain encodes memories and processes information via sequences of neural activity. Traditionally, rhythmic activity and pattern generation have been modeled using coupled oscillators, whereas input classification and pattern completion have been modeled using attractor neural networks. Here, we present a theoretical framework that demonstrates how attractor-based networks can also generate diverse rhythmic patterns, such as those of central pattern generator circuits (CPGs). Additionally, we propose a mechanism for transitioning between patterns. Specifically, we construct a network that can step through a sequence of five different quadruped gaits. It is composed of two dynamically distinct modules: a "counter" network that can count the number of external inputs it receives via a sequence of fixed points and a locomotion network that encodes five different quadruped gaits as limit cycles. A sequence of locomotive gaits is obtained by connecting the counter network with the locomotion network. Specifically, we introduce a new architecture for layering networks that produces fusion attractors, binding pairs of attractors from individual layers. All of this is accomplished within a unified framework of attractor-based models using threshold-linear networks.

Indexed as

BrainCentral Pattern GeneratorsModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAnimalsHumansLocomotion

Identifiers

PMID41637726
PMCPMC13110848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.