ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2026
Comparative Effectiveness of Disease-Modifying Treatments in Double Seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.
Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Disease-Modifying Treatments in Double Seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Double-seronegative neuromyelitis optica: it is possible to interrupt treatment after 10 years of stability.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDouble seronegative NMOSD (DS-NMOSD) lacks approved disease-modifying treatments, and limited data exist on optimal relapse-prevention strategies. In this multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study, we sought to compare the real-world effectiveness of anti-CD20 agents vs nonspecific immunosuppressants as disease-modifying strategies for relapse prevention in DS-NMOSD.
methodsA retrospective cohort database was constructed using standardized data collection from medical records across collaborating centers in the United States, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Thailand, Turkiye, and China. Patients meeting IPND-2015 NMOSD criteria with negative serum aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody testing via cell-based assays and at least 12 months of follow-up were reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of relapses; secondary outcomes included the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and time to relapse.
resultsA total of 103 patients with DS-NMOSD met study criteria, with a median follow-up of 6 years. Anti-CD20 therapy was associated with a significantly lower IRR (0.02, 95% CI 0.01-0.04) and ARR (0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.40) compared with nonspecific immunosuppressants (0.76, 95% CI 0.40-1.43) after adjusting for covariates. Survival analysis demonstrated a prolonged relapse-free interval with anti-CD20 agents. DISCUSSION: Our findings support the use of B-cell depletion as a potentially superior relapse-prevention strategy in DS-NMOSD, highlighting its potential as a first-line therapy. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that, in patients with DS-NMOSD, treatment with a DMT reduces relapse incidence rate ratio compared with no treatment and anti-CD20 DMTs are associated with a lower relapse incidence rate ratio compared with nonspecific immunosuppressants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.