ArticleBulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)2025
Comparison of multimodal return-to-sport testing and force plate-based balance testing among anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients.
Article in Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of our study was to identify force plate-derived balance metrics that were predictive of multimodal return-to-sport test findings in a sample of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients who were at least 6 months postoperative. Subjects completed our multimodal Institutional RTS testing battery which included testing of hip and knee range of motion (ROM), isokinetic quadriceps strength, and core trunk muscle strength (Bunkie test), as well as balance testing on a force plate. Balance metrics predictive of Institutional RTS test findings for the involved leg were identified using multivariable regression with stepwise selection. Model significance was assessed at α = 0.002.
resultsSixteen subjects (7M, 9F) were enrolled in our study with a median age of 29 years (range 20-47). Multivariate multiscale entropy (MMSExyz) of the involved leg was predictive of knee flexion active ROM (P = .02) and Bunkie stabilizing test score (P = .03), MMSExyz of the uninvolved leg was predictive of Bunkie lateral and medial test scores (P = .02 and P = .02), and interlimb symmetry of MMSExyz was predictive of triple jump test score (P = .007). Interlimb symmetry of the COPx shift balance metric was predictive of hip internal rotation active and passive ROM (P = .008 and P = .03) and step-down test score (P = .004).
conclusionForce plate-based balance testing metrics are predictive of some return-to-sport test findings including knee flexion ROM and Bunkie test scores, but further analysis is needed to identify balance metrics predictive of quadriceps isokinetic testing and muscle flexibility testing results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.