Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637593›Full record

ReviewBulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)2025

Private equity investment in orthopedic practices: Part of the changing landscape of health care.

Babatunde Fariyike, Matthew S Galetta, Thomas Youm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Babatunde FariyikeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York.
Matthew S Galetta
Thomas Youm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAs orthopedic surgeons navigate the complexities of selecting their first positions, or established surgeons seek changes in employment, understanding the evolving financial and structural landscape of surgical practices is crucial. The rising influence of private equity (PE) in health care has added another dimension to this decision, as investment firms increasingly acquire stakes in practices to drive consolidation and profitability. Between 2015 and 2022, PE transactions in health care surged dramatically, reflecting the growing trend of practice consolidation in response to declining reimbursements, rising operational costs, and regulatory burdens. PE firms use leveraged buyouts to acquire and restructure practices, often forming management services organizations to streamline operations. Although PE partnerships offer benefits, including access to capital and corporate expertise, they also raise concerns about reduced autonomy, increased procedural volumes, and potential impacts on care quality and costs. This article provides an overview of PE's role in orthopedic practices, including its history, investment strategies, and the anatomy of typical deals. It explores the implications of PE partnerships on financial and clinical outcomes and highlights the importance of physicians staying informed about these developments. By understanding the benefits and risks, orthopedic surgeons can make more informed decisions in the context of a rapidly changing health care environment.

Indexed as

InvestmentsOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsOrthopedic SurgeonsPrivate SectorHumansPrivate PracticeEBITDAorthopedicsprivate equity

Identifiers

PMID41637593
PMCPMC12742485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.