ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Social, environmental and policy contexts affecting the feasibility and acceptability of improving household flooring for better health in rural Kenya.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHomes with unimproved floors (earth, sand, or clay) are associated with increased risks of soil-transmitted parasites and enteric infections, leading to higher morbidity and reduced quality of life. This study explored the enablers and barriers to adopting improved flooring (sealed, washable, and durable) in three culturally diverse regions of Kenya - Narok, Bungoma, and Kwale - to mitigate disease burdens.
methodsBetween August 2021 and July 2022, we conducted 24 focus group discussions with homeowners, stratified by age, gender, and floor type. Additionally, 28 key informant interviews with local government officials, microfinance representatives, and masonry trainers in Kwale and Bungoma provided contextual insights. Transcribed data underwent thematic analysis.
resultsIn the study areas, most homes were constructed by residents themselves using traditional techniques and locally sourced materials. Despite awareness of the health risks, unimproved floors remained widespread. In Bungoma and Kwale, financial constraints and competing household priorities were primary barriers to flooring improvements, while in Narok, cultural identity contributed strongly to the rejection of changes in traditional houses. Key enablers included perceived health benefits and social status, while feasibility depended on the affordability and availability of materials and skilled labour. Strengthening the role of local artisans and leveraging their social influence were seen as effective strategies to shift perceptions on cost and feasibility. Improved collaboration between health and built-environment sectors could enhance community trust and support environmental disease management.
conclusionCommunities in Kwale and Bungoma were more receptive to improved flooring, while cultural practices and preferences in Narok posed significant adoption challenges. For receptive communities, affordable flooring technologies are critical to overcoming financial barriers, while behaviour change initiatives should address cultural and perceptual concerns. However, clinical evidence on locally generated health benefits is needed to support policy decisions and budget allocations for flooring interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.