ArticlePloS one2026
Toward mass customization of animal trackers by design automation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal-borne tracking devices (bio-loggers) are established instruments for researching animal behaviour. However, commercial animal trackers are rather standardized and not perfectly adapted to species-specific requirements. Although species-specific solutions are developed, customization effort is high and requires detailed engineering know-how. Furthermore, the development process brings multiple challenges across the process chain and uncertainties for untested species may require iterative refinements in the early design phase. This interdisciplinary study provides a vision of how to enable mass customization of animal trackers through a web-based design platform. The platform involves biologists in engineering processes, makes custom designs accessible to the community, and enhances reusability. Knowledge-based engineering and design automation algorithms are central platform elements, and they automate engineering processes from requirements to the electronic component selection and generation of 3D-printable housing geometries. The animal tracker housings are manufactured using low-cost 3D-printing (additive manufacturing), which offers high flexibility in terms of producible geometry and batch size. Furthermore, this study presents a design automation prototype that implements core functions of the vision to demonstrate the feasibility of automatically generated animal trackers. The software architecture of the design automation prototype and the intermediate algorithm steps are described as open source. To demonstrate the functionality of the design automation prototype, the animal tracker housings of three species are successfully generated and produced. The algorithms take less than 50 seconds to generate the three housings. This demonstrates, how the automation eliminates bottlenecks in the development process and thus greatly reduces efforts for customized animal trackers. The full realisation of the vision can eventually empower biologists to design animal trackers without the involvement of engineers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.