Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637434›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Circuit explained: How does a transformer perform compositional generalization.

Cheng Tang, Brenden Lake, Mehrdad Jazayeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng TangDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Brenden LakeDepartments of Computer Science and Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Mehrdad JazayeriDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9764-6961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compositional generalization-the systematic combination of known components into novel structures-is fundamental to flexible human cognition, yet the mechanisms that enable it in neural networks remain poorly understood in both machine learning and cognitive science. [1] showed that a compact encoder-decoder transformer can achieve simple forms of compositional generalization in a sequence arithmetic task. In this work, we identify and mechanistically interpret the circuit responsible for this behavior in such a model. Using causal ablations, we isolate the circuit and show that this understanding enables precise activation edits to steer the model's outputs predictably. We find that the circuit performs function composition without encoding the specific semantics of any given function-instead, it leverages a disentangled representation of token position and identity to apply a general token remapping rule across an entire family of functions. Although the circuit mechanism was identified in a limited number of small scale models with a synthetic task, it sheds light to how symbolic compositionality can emerge in transformers and offer testable hypotheses for similar mechanisms in large-scale models. Code for model and analysis is publicly available.

Indexed as

CognitionGeneralization, PsychologicalNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41637434
PMCPMC12871980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.