Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637424›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Lessons learnt about implementing LEGO based therapy (Play Brick Therapy) based on fidelity data and experience from a large school-based randomised controlled trial.

Katie Biggs, Gina Gomez de la Cuesta, Ellen Kingsley, Jean McPherson, Fergus Murray, Margaret Laurie, Matt Bursnall, Elizabeth Coates, Amy Barr

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katie BiggsClinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4468-7417
Gina Gomez de la CuestaPlay Included C.I.C, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ellen KingsleyChild Oriented Mental Health Innovation Collaborative, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, York, United Kingdom.
Jean McPhersonPlay Included C.I.C, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Fergus MurrayAutistic Mutual Aid Society Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Margaret LauriePlay Included C.I.C, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-6830
Matt BursnallClinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth CoatesClinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Amy BarrClinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLEGO® based therapy, a social skills program for autistic children and young people, involves collaborative LEGO® building with adult guidance. This paper examines how well the program was delivered in a recent school randomised controlled trial and explores areas for improvement in implementation. The main trial results are published elsewhere.

methodsThe I-SOCIALISE trial investigated LEGO® based therapy for autistic children in schools. Researchers recruited 98 schools and randomly assigned them to deliver LEGO® based therapy or usual care. LEGO® based therapy sessions lasted one hour per week for 12 weeks with groups of 3 children. Schools received a 3-hour training session and a manual. Researchers measured fidelity to the LEGO® based therapy programme using self-reported checklists and video analysis. Research team insight and experience of the delivery of the training and intervention are included in this paper.

resultsLEGO® based therapy was delivered to autistic children in schools with high fidelity according to facilitators and independent reviewers. Most groups (69%) received all 12 sessions, and nearly all groups received the minimum dose of 6 sessions (93%). Sessions typically lasted about an hour and had 1-2 autistic children. Facilitators were mostly teaching assistants with moderate experience in autism. Over 90% of sessions included core elements like group building and social interaction. There were disagreements between facilitators and reviewers on adherence to some program elements like rewards and discussing roles. DISCUSSION: LEGO® based therapy was delivered with high fidelity in a large school trial, but there were areas for improvement, such as facilitator training and focus on social interaction for and between children. The authors suggest that facilitators may have been more focused on completing LEGO® builds than on facilitating meaningful social interaction and play between children. Three hours of training may not have been enough to prepare facilitators for their role. The study also did not capture young people's experience of the program, which is important for understanding its effectiveness and impact. Future research should explore how to better measure these aspects and develop a stronger theory of how LEGO® based therapy works.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderPlay TherapySocial SkillsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleSchools

Identifiers

PMID41637424
PMCPMC12872000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.