Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637420›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Visual security defense for industrial inspection based on computer vision.

Zhihao Jiang, Haotian Yuan, Chenrui Zeng, Liu Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhihao JiangYangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Haotian YuanYangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Chenrui ZengYangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Liu FuYangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0034-6128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As intelligent manufacturing advances, computer vision-based defect detection systems have become essential components of industrial automation. However, this progress has also revealed new security vulnerabilities. In this work, we identify and examine a stealthy adversarial vector-the Alpha Channel Attack-which exploits the often-ignored transparency layer in RGBA images to inject imperceptible perturbations, thereby evading both human perception and conventional preprocessing defenses.We evaluate this threat across diverse model architectures, including YOLOv5, FastGAN, and state-of-the-art vision-language models such as DeepSeek-VL2, ChatGPT-4o, and KIMI. Experimental results show that alpha-channel perturbations cause substantial degradation in detection, generation, and multimodal alignment metrics-including mAP, FID, BLEU, METEOR, and CLIP Score-while leaving the visible image content unchanged.To mitigate this invisible yet high-impact risk, we propose a lightweight detection mechanism that integrates histogram overlap and MSE analysis within the alpha channel. The framework achieves an AUC of 0.998, demonstrating strong capability in identifying adversarial samples under real-world constraints.Overall, this study reveals a critical blind spot in modern visual data pipelines and introduces both a novel threat model and an effective defense strategy, contributing to the development of more resilient industrial AI systems.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIndustryAlgorithmsDetection AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41637420
PMCPMC12872028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.