ArticlePloS one2026
Performance evaluation and reference interval establishment of Abbott Alinity thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) assay for diagnosing Graves' disease.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Abbott Alinity TRAb chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay and establish the reference interval for healthy Chinese populations.
methodsThe precision, analytical sensitivity and linearity of Abbott TRAb assay were verified in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. A total of 300 samples from patients with Grave's disease (GD) and other thyroid diseases were collected for method comparison and clinical performance verification. The performance of Abbott and Snibe TRAb assays was compared to Roche TRAb assay by correlation and agreement analysis. The diagnostic performance of Abbott TRAb assay was analyzed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The reference interval of Abbott TRAb was established from a cohort of 366 healthy individuals.
resultsThe Abbott Alinity TRAb assay demonstrated excellent precision, with repeatability (CV%) ranging from 1.04% to 5.92%, and within-laboratory imprecision (CV%) ranging from 1.09% to 5.92%. Manufacturer-claimed limits of blank, detection, and quantification were successfully verified. Linearity was confirmed from 1.14 to 47.72 IU/L. Strong correlation was observed between Abbott and Roche assays (Spearman r = 0.972; slope = 1.060), while Snibe and Roche assays showed lower correlation (r = 0.784). Concordance analysis showed the total agreement with Roche results were 97.7% for Abbott and 96.7% for Snibe. Diagnostic accuracy of the Abbott TRAb assay for GD was high, yielding an area under curve (AUC) of 0.999, sensitivity of 98.4%, and specificity of 99.4% at an optimal cutoff of 2.89 IU/L. The upper reference limits at 95th percentile and 97.5th percentile for healthy Chinese population using Abbott TRAb assay were 1.56 IU/L and 1.95 IU/L, respectively.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the robustness of Abbott Alinity TRAb CMIA in clinical use with its verified analytical and clinical performance and established the reference interval for Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.