Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637408›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Single-item versus scale: Comparing respondent demographic, social, and health characteristics by measure of loneliness using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) data.

Stephanie A Chamberlain, Lauren E Griffith, Rachel D Savage, Jesse Batara, Wenting Yan, Andrea Gruneir

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie A ChamberlainFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-3060
Lauren E GriffithDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rachel D SavageWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jesse BataraDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Wenting YanFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Andrea GruneirWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing research and clinical attention to loneliness has led to a wide range of available measures; however, few studies directly compare different loneliness measures within the same population. Measures include single-item, direct questions and indirect, multi-item scales. This study compared responses and respondent characteristics between a direct single-item loneliness question and an indirect multi-item scale.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of population-based survey data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). The sample included baseline (2010-2015) and follow-up 1 respondents (2015-2018) from both the Tracking (computer-assisted telephone interviews) and Comprehensive (in-home assessment) cohorts (n = 43,235). Loneliness was assessed using a direct single-item question from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10) and the 3-item Loneliness Scale. We categorized loneliness using ordinal (not lonely, moderately lonely, severely lonely) and dichotomous (lonely/not lonely) classifications. Unweighted descriptive statistics were used to examine demographic, social, and health characteristics across measures and response categories.

resultsAmong the 43,235 CLSA respondents, 14% (n = 5,848) were identified by both the single-item question and the scale as lonely, 67% (n = 28,998) were identified as not lonely by both, leaving 19% classified differently based on measure. Individuals identified as lonely respondents by both measures were more often older, women, less educated, and had lower income. Those classified as severely lonely on the single item but not lonely on the scale were older than other groups. In contrast, respondents who were moderately lonely on the single-item question tended to be married, report higher income, and have greater social contact.

conclusionThe direct single-item question and the indirect multi-item scale provided comparable overall classifications of loneliness in our CLSA sample. However, respondent characteristics varied across the more granular response categories, highlighting the importance of measure selection depending on study aims.

Indexed as

AgingLonelinessAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaCanadian Longitudinal Study on AgingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41637408
PMCPMC12871960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.