ArticlePloS one2026
Single-item versus scale: Comparing respondent demographic, social, and health characteristics by measure of loneliness using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Correlates of Perceived Food Noise Among U.S. Adults in a Nationally Representative Sample.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Association between loneliness and incident use of benzodiazepines and opioids: analyses of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrowing research and clinical attention to loneliness has led to a wide range of available measures; however, few studies directly compare different loneliness measures within the same population. Measures include single-item, direct questions and indirect, multi-item scales. This study compared responses and respondent characteristics between a direct single-item loneliness question and an indirect multi-item scale.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of population-based survey data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). The sample included baseline (2010-2015) and follow-up 1 respondents (2015-2018) from both the Tracking (computer-assisted telephone interviews) and Comprehensive (in-home assessment) cohorts (n = 43,235). Loneliness was assessed using a direct single-item question from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10) and the 3-item Loneliness Scale. We categorized loneliness using ordinal (not lonely, moderately lonely, severely lonely) and dichotomous (lonely/not lonely) classifications. Unweighted descriptive statistics were used to examine demographic, social, and health characteristics across measures and response categories.
resultsAmong the 43,235 CLSA respondents, 14% (n = 5,848) were identified by both the single-item question and the scale as lonely, 67% (n = 28,998) were identified as not lonely by both, leaving 19% classified differently based on measure. Individuals identified as lonely respondents by both measures were more often older, women, less educated, and had lower income. Those classified as severely lonely on the single item but not lonely on the scale were older than other groups. In contrast, respondents who were moderately lonely on the single-item question tended to be married, report higher income, and have greater social contact.
conclusionThe direct single-item question and the indirect multi-item scale provided comparable overall classifications of loneliness in our CLSA sample. However, respondent characteristics varied across the more granular response categories, highlighting the importance of measure selection depending on study aims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.