ArticlePloS one2026
Effect of morphology on the biomechanics of contusion models of non-human primate spinal cord injury: a finite element study in a digital population.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) stem from mechanical events that translate external forces through the spinal column, damaging the spinal cord. Since tissue damage is related to the strain/stress it experiences, finite element models are being increasingly used to supplement pre-clinical models of animal SCI. Simulations; however, are often conducted in a single geometry, while morphological variability has been highlighted as having an important influence on biomechanical outcomes. We developed tissue scale finite element models of non-human primate spinal cord injury with different morphologies (N = 40) to assess the effect of morphology on biomechanical outcomes. Applying the same displacement to different digital subjects generated different peak forces, and the magnitude of these forces was related to subject morphology, specifically the area of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the occlusion of the spinal canal by the spinal cord (SCO/SC), particularly in the mediolateral direction (SCOW/SCW). Despite the same loading (0.75 N preload and 4-mm displacement at 500 mm/s), different subjects experienced a wide range of impact forces (13-33 N) due to morphological differences. In pre-clinical experiments, this variability could lead to drastically different outcomes, ranging from no functional deficits at the lower end (13 N) to unintended contralateral contusions at the higher end (33 N), despite the intent to induce unilateral injury. Peak forces were statistically correlated with white matter sparing, which affects observed functional outcomes. We showed that both tissue-level and impact biomechanics are significantly affected by morphology, emphasizing the need to include diversity and morphological variability into computational models of spinal cord injury. This highlights that either impact parameters need to be adjusted for morphological variability or that animals should be pre-screened for cord/column morphology, which can be prohibitively expensive. Future work is needed to determine how to scale these impact parameters for different morphologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.