ArticlePloS one2026
Transcriptomic analysis reveals the impact of concurrent, resistance, and endurance training on skeletal muscle.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Skeletal Muscle Transcriptomic Responses to Concurrent Training With Polyphenols in Ageing Adults: A Randomized Trial.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shared and divergent molecular mechanisms underlying skeletal muscle adaptation to different exercise modalities are not fully understood. This study aimed to compare the physiological and transcriptomic responses to 12 weeks of concurrent (CET), resistance (RES), or endurance (END) training in healthy males. While all groups exhibited similar increases in lean body mass, RES and END elicited distinct functional improvements in maximal strength and aerobic capacity, respectively. Notably, CET preserved strength gains comparable to RES but showed a blunted improvement in anaerobic power. Transcriptomic analyses revealed both common and modality-specific signatures. Although the number of differentially expressed genes varied across groups (CET: 392; RES: 17; END: 49), enrichment analyses consistently identified the engagement of extracellular matrix (ECM) organization pathways. Gene set enrichment analysis further demonstrated a universal activation of ECM remodeling and an inhibition of translation initiation processes post-training. Weighted gene co-expression and protein-protein interaction network analyses pinpointed core genes associated with each modality, including COL1A1/COL1A2 for CET and END, and SPARC/ASPN for RES. Regulatory network predictions implicated the miR-29 family and JUN as potential co-regulators of collagen-related genes. In conclusion, this integrated analysis establishes ECM remodeling as a fundamental transcriptional response supporting exercise-induced hypertrophy common to diverse training modalities, while simultaneously identifying distinct gene regulatory networks that underlie their divergent functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.