Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637397›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Survey of vulnerable Amazonian manatees using environmental DNA (eDNA): A method for survey in remote field settings.

Kaitlyn Romoser, Shizuka Hashimoto, Nasrah M C Hamdan, Leonardo Sena, Miriam Marmontel, Tomas Hrbek, Izeni P Farias, Kirk O Winemiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaitlyn RomoserDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3325-4220
Shizuka HashimotoLaboratório de Evolução e Genética Animal, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Nasrah M C HamdanLaboratório de Evolução e Genética Animal, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Leonardo SenaCenter for Advacnced Biodiversity Studies (CEABIO), Biological Sciences Institute, Federal University of Pará, Guamá, Belém, Pennsylvania, Brazil.
Miriam MarmontelInstituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Tefé AM, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-9548
Tomas HrbekLaboratório de Evolução e Genética Animal, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3239-7068
Izeni P FariasLaboratório de Evolução e Genética Animal, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-4351
Kirk O WinemillerDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The only exclusively freshwater lineage of Sirenia, the Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) is listed by the IUCN as vulnerable, with populations projected to decline further during the coming decades. Given that illegal hunting, pollution, habitat disturbance and other impacts are ongoing, it is imperative to assess the distribution and abundance of this unique, elusive aquatic mammal. In this study, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) methods to test for T. inunguis presence at three locations along the longitudinal gradient of the Amazon River and its tributaries (Tefé, Manaus, Belém). At each location, water samples were collected at sites spanning a disturbance gradient from urban to protected reserves. We developed a field methodology to preserve DNA for up to 13 days or more without requiring freezing or cooling of samples. This method performed similarly to traditional cold-storage methods used for eDNA research. In the lab, DNA was extracted from the samples followed by PCR amplification, and Illumina sequencing. Detection of Amazonian manatee DNA was more than three times greater in the western Amazon (Tefé and Mamirauá Reserve) where human activity is low. Manatee DNA was detected at six sites in the central Amazon (Manaus) and in only two sites in the eastern Amazon near the coast (Belém) where human populations and impacts are greater. eDNA methodology was effective for detecting manatees and is expected to be useful for estimating their broader distribution as well as surveying other aquatic species in tropical rivers.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsBrazilConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemRiversDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID41637397
PMCPMC12872014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.