Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637378›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2026

Failure mode and effect analysis in the indwelling urinary catheterization process.

Caroline Zottele Piasentin Giacomini, Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo Silva, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Paulo Sousa, Tania Solange Bosi de Souza Magnago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline Zottele Piasentin GiacominiUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4537-399X
Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo SilvaUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3454-6602
Janete de Souza UrbanettoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Ciências da Saúde e da Vida, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4697-1641
Paulo SousaUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Lisboa, LX, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9502-6075
Tania Solange Bosi de Souza MagnagoUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-1604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

to analyze potential risks in the adult indwelling urinary catheterization process. exploratory, descriptive and evaluative research in a teaching hospital. Working group with ten health care providers: eight nurses, one physician and one nursing technician. Activity flowchart and description built through process modeling. Potential risk analysis based on the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis method. four sub-processes identified for the indwelling urinary catheterization process. Process review-based proactive health care risk analysis showed 55 potential failure modes, 92 potential failure causes, and 40 potential failure effects. the method applied to review the indwelling urinary catheterization process in the hospital setting supported the proactive health care risk analysis; this issue should be further considered to contribute to the safety culture at the national level. Nurses are strategic in decision-making on health care risk management in said process, throughout catheter introduction, continuous use, and removal.

Indexed as

Catheters, IndwellingHealthcare Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisUrinary CatheterizationHumans

Identifiers

PMID41637378
PMCPMC12863658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.