ArticleBrazilian dental journal2026
Evaluation of cytotoxicity and bleaching efficacy of gels with calcium polyphosphate and violet LED.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the whitening effect and cytotoxicity of low-concentration hydrogen peroxide (HP 10%) combined with calcium polyphosphate (CaPP) submicroparticles, irradiated or not with a violet LED (LEDv). Bovine tooth samples were divided into 6 groups (n=6): Control Group (no treatment); LED; Manipulated 10% HP (HP10%); Manipulated 10% HP + CaPP 1.5% w/t (HP10%_CaPP); Manipulated 10% HP + LED (HP10%+L); and Manipulated 10% HP + CaPP 1.5% w/t + LED (HP 10%_CaPP+L). The treatments were applied to the enamel of disks mounted in artificial pulp chambers. The whitening effect (ΔE00 and ΔWID) was measured, and the extracts were applied to MDPC-23 cells, assessing cell viability, oxidative stress, and HP diffusion. The data were analyzed using generalized linear models, and the Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn tests were applied for WID (a=5%). Cell viability was significantly reduced in all HP groups compared to controls (Control: 100.15 ± 1.71%; LED: 99.89 ± 2.43%), with the highest viability in HP10%_CaPP+L (72.17 ± 4.14%) and the lowest in HP10% (54.48 ± 1.72%). Oxidative stress was lowest in HP10%_CaPP+L (2.91 ± 0.17) and highest in HP10%+L (3.77 ± 0.15). HP diffusion was markedly reduced with CaPP (HP10%_CaPP+L: 2.93 ± 0.18 vs. HP10%: 4.24 ± 0.10). In terms of color analysis, the addition of CaPP did not alter the bleaching efficacy. The addition of CaPP to hydrogen peroxide, combined with violet LED, demonstrated effective bleaching action, positive indicators of cytocompatibility, increased cell viability, and reduced oxidative stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.