Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637344›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2026

Contribution of artificial intelligence to the imaging diagnosis of pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis.

Roberta Feijó Carvalho, Sandra Valéria Coelho da Silva, Michely Alexandrino de Souza Pinheiro, Rafaela Baroni Aurilio, Edwin Tao Ming Klinkenberg, Sara Vegas Viedma, Maria de Fátima Bazhuni Pombo Sant'Anna, Ana Alice Amaral Ibiapina Parente, Claudete Aparecida Araújo Cardoso, Clemax Couto Sant'Anna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberta Feijó CarvalhoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-410X
Sandra Valéria Coelho da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-3746
Michely Alexandrino de Souza PinheiroUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-9280
Rafaela Baroni AurilioUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2727-520X
Edwin Tao Ming KlinkenbergDelft Imaging Systems B.V., Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5793-2244
Sara Vegas ViedmaDelft Imaging Systems B.V., Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9221-3952
Maria de Fátima Bazhuni Pombo Sant'AnnaUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Medicina, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-6070
Ana Alice Amaral Ibiapina ParenteUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-7311
Claudete Aparecida Araújo CardosoUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Faculdade de Medicina, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-6814
Clemax Couto Sant'AnnaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-8065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric tuberculosis (TB) remains a diagnostic challenge in Brazil and worldwide. The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends a clinical scoring system (S-MoH) for children and adolescents with suspected TB. Interpretation of radiographs within this scoring system may require specialist input. AI-based systems, such as CAD4TB (Delft Imaging Systems B.V.), approved by the WHO for adults, are not yet recommended for standalone use in children under 15 years of age. A retrospective study was conducted at a pediatric institute from January 31, 2017, to January 29, 2025, including 179 patients aged 0-14 years with pulmonary TB or other diseases. CAD4TBv7.1 analyzed chest radiographs using two cutoff points established by Youden's index: 53.48 for analyses against the S-MoH score and 53.89 for analyses against microbiological confirmation. Results were compared with both microbiological confirmation and S-MoH score. Among the 179 participants, 61 (34.1%) had TB, 25 of which were microbiologically confirmed. CAD4TBv7.1 showed an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.71, with a sensitivity of 52% and a specificity of 86.3% compared with microbiological diagnosis. Against S-MoH, AUROC was 0.59, with a sensitivity of 34.43% and a specificity of 86.44%. CAD4TBv7.1 demonstrated low sensitivity and high specificity, particularly regarding its overall discriminative capacity. Thus, CAD4TBv7.1 emerges as a promising complementary screening tool for pediatric TB. Although its standalone use is not yet recommended, it may complement S-MoH in settings lacking radiologists. Investments in AI must be accompanied by consistent pediatric validation and strategies that combine technological innovation with traditional and cost-effective clinical approach.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTuberculosis, PulmonaryAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRadiography, ThoracicRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID41637344
PMCPMC12858168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.