Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637311›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2026

Camille Thériault, Lionel Cailhol, Simon Poirier, Félix-Antoine Bérubé, Estelle Ouellet, Pierre David, Alexandre Hudon

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camille ThériaultDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lionel CailholDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Simon PoirierDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Félix-Antoine BérubéDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Estelle OuelletDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Pierre DavidDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexandre HudonDépartement de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-0928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the age of social media, public perception of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is shaped as much by clinical settings as by online comments. This study aimed to explore how internet users react to TikTok videos about BPD. The primary objective was to identify emerging themes in the comments and to better understand social perceptions of BPD in the digital space.

methodA qualitative study was conducted, based on the systematic collection of 25,197 comments from 141 public TikTok videos about BPD. A representative sample of comments was extracted and subjected to thematic analysis using a categorical iteration method. Themes and sub-themes were identified inductively, based on rigorous coding and cross-validation among evaluators.

resultsThe results reveal a strong concern among internet users regarding diagnostic confusion between BPD and other psychiatric disorders, particularly autism spectrum disorder and ADHD. The issue of self-diagnosis and self-treatment is frequently addressed, reflecting a need for identity appropriation and mistrust of professional diagnoses. The impact of BPD on interpersonal relationships is widely discussed, ranging from relationship tensions to coping strategies. The ambivalent role of social media is highlighted, both as a source of support and a vehicle for misinformation. Finally, internet users report experiences of social isolation, stigmatisation and fear of being labelled, emphasising the importance of emotional support in the recovery process.

conclusionsTikTok is becoming a space for building mental health identities for people living with BPD. Our findings call for the development of digital education initiatives and targeted interventions to counter stigma and support care pathways in the digital environment.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderInternetInterpersonal RelationsSocial MediaSocial PerceptionDigital MediaFemaleHumansQualitative Researchanalyse qualitativeborderline personality disorderdiagnostic psychiatriquedisinformationinterpersonal relationsinterpersonal relationshipsisolement socialmédias sociauxmental healthmésinformationpsychiatric diagnosisqualitative analysisrelations interpersonnellessanté mentalesocial isolationsocial mediasocial stigmasocial stigmatisationstigmatisation socialeTikToktrouble de la personnalité limite

Identifiers

PMID41637311
PMCPMC13009609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.