ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2026
Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn the age of social media, public perception of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is shaped as much by clinical settings as by online comments. This study aimed to explore how internet users react to TikTok videos about BPD. The primary objective was to identify emerging themes in the comments and to better understand social perceptions of BPD in the digital space.
methodA qualitative study was conducted, based on the systematic collection of 25,197 comments from 141 public TikTok videos about BPD. A representative sample of comments was extracted and subjected to thematic analysis using a categorical iteration method. Themes and sub-themes were identified inductively, based on rigorous coding and cross-validation among evaluators.
resultsThe results reveal a strong concern among internet users regarding diagnostic confusion between BPD and other psychiatric disorders, particularly autism spectrum disorder and ADHD. The issue of self-diagnosis and self-treatment is frequently addressed, reflecting a need for identity appropriation and mistrust of professional diagnoses. The impact of BPD on interpersonal relationships is widely discussed, ranging from relationship tensions to coping strategies. The ambivalent role of social media is highlighted, both as a source of support and a vehicle for misinformation. Finally, internet users report experiences of social isolation, stigmatisation and fear of being labelled, emphasising the importance of emotional support in the recovery process.
conclusionsTikTok is becoming a space for building mental health identities for people living with BPD. Our findings call for the development of digital education initiatives and targeted interventions to counter stigma and support care pathways in the digital environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.