ArticleCoDAS2026
Speech speed in audiovisual resources in the learning process of university students: a scoping review.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to map studies that investigated the influence of speech rate on the reproduction of audiovisual resources in university students' learning using a Scope review. RESEARCH STRATEGIES: The PCC strategy was used where P- University students, C- Increased or decreased speech rate, C- Learning. The searches were conducted using the SciELO, Lilacs, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Scientific articles published in the databases above with a target audience of university students were included; works that compared average speech rate with increased or decreased speed and had learning-related skills as the study response. DATA ANALYSIS: The Joanna Briggs Institute checklists were used for methodological quality assessment.
resultsWe found that four articles observed an improvement in learning performance when the audiovisual resource was presented at a speed of up to 2x, three did not observe a difference and two studies observed a worsening in the skills involved in learning.The results indicate a low risk of bias in most studies included.
conclusionA study indicated improved learning in audiovisuals at a speed slower than 1x. It was observed that reproduction speed rates of audiovisual resources impact university students' learning process. Rates greater than 2x limit the learning process. Rates within the normal range (between 1x and 1.75x) are more favorable for capturing the content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.