ArticleCoDAS2026
Cortical and subcortical auditory evoked potentials with verbal stimulus: correlation and association in adults.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the correlation and association between the Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (LLAEP) and the Frequency Following Response (FFR) in young adults with normal hearing thresholds.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional, quantitative, and qualitative study. The sample included 32 young adults (mean age of 22.5 years) of both sexes who met the inclusion criteria. The participants underwent basic audiological evaluation, screening of auditory skills through the Random Gap Detection Test and Dichotic Digits Test, and electrophysiological tests: Auditory Brainstem Response with click stimulus, Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential, and Frequency Following Response with verbal stimulus.
resultsA statistically significant and positive brightness was observed between waves V, A and C and waves P1 and N2, evidencing the participation of auditory structures of the primary auditory cortex in the generation of FFR responses, and a negative appearance between waves C and N2, reflecting the different auditory abilities to generate the responses of each component. There was no significant association between individuals classified as normal and altered in the tests in general performed in the present study or when associated between each component.
conclusionWaves V, A, and C correlate with waves P1 and N2 of the Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential in young adults. There was no evidence of associations between the qualitative results of the Frequency Following Response and the Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.