ArticlePLOS global public health2026
The humanitarian-development nexus and sexual and reproductive health interventions in fragile settings: A scoping review.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concurrent need for both humanitarian and development assistance in fragile settings and protracted emergencies has been termed the humanitarian-development nexus (HDN) or the humanitarian-development-peace nexus (HDpN). We undertook a scoping review on the operationalization of the HDpN for sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health interventions in fragile settings. We screened 2,570 publications, of which 36 peer-reviewed and 27 grey literature publications met inclusion criteria. Very few included studies focused on peace aspects within the HDpN and child and adolescent health. Publications by humanitarian authors often classified maternal and newborn health as a component of sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Data extraction and analysis focused on three overarching themes: SRH prioritization across the HDN, the transition between minimum and comprehensive services, and health systems strengthening. This review provides concrete guidance on how to operationalize the HDN for SRH interventions in fragile settings. Expansion of SRH preparedness measures is necessary given the current trajectory of the climate emergency and other destabilizing events. The ability to flexibly transition between minimum and comprehensive services is important for maintaining service continuity in crisis-affected settings. COVID-19 proved to be a significant disruptor of SRH services, and a key inflection point in the collaboration between humanitarian and development practitioners. The use of task-shifting, decentralization, and telemedicine were approaches that may be adopted to maintain service delivery according to different contexts. Lastly, strengthening health systems was identified as essential across the HDN. With more crises extending for years, the wider literature has emphasized the necessity of health systems strengthening for reaching the Sustainable Development Goals, including in fragile settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.