ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2026
Pretesting Parenting Instruments with Indigenous Fathers and Two-Spirit Parents: A Qualitative Study.
Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and PurposeThis qualitative study is part of a larger Indigenous community-led project in Southern Ontario, Canada, to support Indigenous fathers and Two-Spirit parents through the development of a culturally relevant parenting program. Conducted during Phase 2, this study pretested six well-established instruments to assess their clarity, comprehension, and cultural safety for use in evaluating the parenting program in Phase 3.Methods and ProceduresSix participants, all of whom were First Nations or Métis, either expecting a baby or parenting a child under the age of three, completed five instruments, specifically the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and either the Paternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (PAAS) or Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale (PPAS). Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather insights on the instruments' instructions, terminology, response scales, and cultural relevance. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis.ResultsParticipants identified barriers to understanding and accurately completing the instruments, including challenging terminology, ambiguous response scales, and cultural safety concerns. Recommendations included simplifying language, clarifying scale anchors, adding culturally relevant questions, and establishing culturally safe support pathways for participants disclosing distress.ConclusionEuro-Western developed instruments require refinement to ensure accessibility, cultural relevance, and safety for Indigenous fathers and Two-Spirit parents. This includes adapting tools to reflect Indigenous literacy frameworks and holistic wellness perspectives. This study underscores the ethical imperative for researchers to ensure cultural appropriateness and safety when engaging Indigenous communities in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.