Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637212›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Comparison of Different Maintenance Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed

Xi Chen, Chenyan Fang, Yanglong Guo, Yingli Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xi ChenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-8809
Chenyan FangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Yanglong GuoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Yingli ZhangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionNiraparib and bevacizumab are two principal maintenance therapies for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients with

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedBevacizumabFemaleHumansIndazolesMaintenance ChemotherapyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPiperidinesProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesBevacizumabBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinIndazolesniraparibPiperidinesadvanced ovarian cancerbevacizumabBRCA wild-typenewly diagnosedniraparib

Identifiers

PMID41637212
PMCPMC12873068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.