ArticleSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association2026
Effectiveness of AI-enhanced colonoscopy: A case-control study using real world evidence in a young screening age population.
Article in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer aided detection (CADe) colonoscopy has been shown in randomized controlled trials to improve detection of adenomatous colorectal polyps. However, in real-world settings the benefits are less clear. Our objective was to assess CADe colonoscopy compared to routine colonoscopy in a clinical practice setting in the Arab region with a low screening age (40 years old). Methods: After the implementation of the CADe system (GI Genius, Medtronic) in our hospital in September 2021 until July 2023, all CADe cases were registered and matched to routine colonoscopy cases with (1:4) ratio. Assignment of patients to the CADe system versus the routine colonoscopy was pragmatic design based on scheduling and availability factors. Primary endpoints were adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Results: A total of 840 patients were included, out of that 72 patients were excluded due to Boston Bowel Prep <6. The final analysis included 768 patients (161 with CADe, 607 without). The CADe system was found to significantly increase the mean APC (0.602 vs. 0.293; rate ratio 1.80 [1.40–2.32]; P < 0.001) and ADR, 30.4% with CADe versus 16.8% without CADe (adjusted RR 1.68 [1.27–2.22], P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in withdrawal time with CADe. Conclusion: In our study, CADe significantly increased the detection of adenomatous polyps in a young screening age population in a clinical practice setting. These findings support recent randomized controlled trials and contrast the findings of recent studies showing lack of benefit in real world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.