Trial reportJournal of Parkinson's disease2026
Can transcranial Direct Current Stimulation enhance the efficacy of a rehabilitative intervention for the treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's disease? A double-blind, randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal gait parameters during turning differ in Parkinson's disease patients with and without freezing of gait.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundFreezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major cause of disability and falls and often responds incompletely to conventional therapy. Rehabilitative interventions including cognitive strategies and sensory cueing are efficacious, but difficulties in learning impair executing these strategies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances motor task learning and might enhance the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions.ObjectiveWe assessed whether tDCS can enhance the efficacy of physiotherapy for FOG in PD.MethodsIn a randomized, double-blind, controlled study, anodal tDCS (pre-/motor cortex) or sham-tDCS were delivered combined with a standardized rehabilitative intervention in 24 PD patients with FOG for eight sessions within four weeks. Clinical assessment included walking a Parcourse, timed gait tests, FOG questionary, and clinical scales at baseline, across the interventions with a follow-up 3-months after the last intervention.ResultsNineteen PD patients with FOG completed the study. TDCS combined with physiotherapy reduced FOG, but not more than physiotherapy aloneConclusionCombining tDCS with physiotherapy did not enhance its efficacy in reducing FOG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.