Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637075›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Between-Hospital Variation in Failure to Rescue After Major Surgery.

David Schwappach, Marcel Zwahlen, Michael M Havranek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David SchwappachInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marcel ZwahlenInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael M HavranekCompetence Center for Health Data Science, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as postoperative mortality among patients with treatable complications, is a recognized patient safety concern. FTR reflects institutional capacity for timely management of deterioration and has been proposed as a quality indicator less dependent on baseline complication risk. Evidence on systematic hospital-level variation outside the US remains limited. Objective: To estimate national postoperative FTR rates, quantify between-hospital variation, and identify hospitals with better- or worse-than-expected performance using risk-standardized mortality ratios (RSMRs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study conducted in Switzerland applied the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient safety indicator 04 (PSI04) definition to administrative hospital data to all acute-care hospitals in Switzerland from January 2019 to December 2023. Participants included surgical inpatients with at least 1 PSI04-defined complication (ie, deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, sepsis, shock and/or cardiac arrest, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage and/or ulcer). Hospital-level variation was assessed using multilevel logistic regression with hospital random intercepts and summarized with RSMRs. Alternative models were estimated to explore the stability of results. Exposure: Acute care hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality following eligible complications, expressed as crude FTR rates and RSMRs. The intraclass correlation coefficient quantified systematic performance variation. Results: Among 41 506 inpatients undergoing surgery with PSI04-defined complications (mean [SD] age, 67.6 [14.8] years; 24 692 [59.5%] men), 7310 in-hospital deaths occurred. The crude national FTR rate was 18.07 (95% CI, 17.66-18.50) of 100 admissions. In 61 hospitals with at least 100 cases, adjusted odds ratio for death varied between the lowest- and highest-performing hospitals from 0.56 (95% CI, 0.38-0.80) to 1.75 (95% CI, 1.59-1.92). Hospital-level variance was 0.114 (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.034; 95% CI, 0.020-0.055). An estimated 1045 of 7114 observed FTR deaths (14.7%) within the hospital sample were attributable to below-average hospital performance. Five hospitals (8.2%) performed significantly better than expected, 42 (68.9%) as expected, and 14 (23.0%) substantially worse than expected based on RSMR 95% CIs. Poorer performance clustered in medium- and high-volume hospitals. Alternative regression models confirmed stability of results. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of FTR, nearly 1 in 5 patients undergoing surgery who experienced serious complications died, with substantial between-hospital variation. Multilevel modeling indicated that institutional performance accounted for 1045 potentially avoidable deaths. These findings support FTR as an international patient safety indicator and highlight the need to investigate organizational determinants of variation to inform system-level improvement strategies.

Indexed as

Failure to Rescue, Health CareHospital MortalityHospitalsPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Procedures, OperativeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID41637075
PMCPMC12873769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.