Observational studyJAMA network open2026
Demographic and Clinicopathologic Factors Associated With Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic nutritional index versus pragmatically operationalized GLIM criteria for predicting postoperative complications and recovery in spine surgery: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Barriers to continuity of outpatient infusion-port maintenance among patients with cancer: a single-center cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Cognitive-attitudinal factors predict CBT-I enrollment willingness in Chinese sleep clinic patients: a knowledge-attitudes-practices survey.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Health outcomes, financial protection, and cost-effectiveness of community chronic disease management in China: a cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Nutritional vulnerability, food insecurity, and unmet supportive care needs in multiple myeloma: a cross-sectional study from China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Navigating the Terrain of Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Charting the Complex Landscape of Guidelines and Recurrence Risks.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Health literacy and urban-rural disparities: a cross-sectional study of access, adherence, and quality of life across the neurological spectrum.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Beyond patient education: fall prevention knowledge, health literacy, and implementation gaps in Chinese hospitals-a patient-caregiver study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Risk-stratified surveillance after LEEP: a nomogram integrating HPV persistence, margin status, and clinical factors to predict CIN2+ recurrence.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Recognition of worsening heart failure symptoms, help-seeking attitudes, and time-to-presentation in chronic heart failure: a single-center KAP study in China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Current colorectal surveillance guidelines emphasize adenoma characteristics but overlook temporal, racial, and sex-based heterogeneity in recurrence risk, a gap that limits equitable and personalized care. Objective: To evaluate the associations of demographic factors, obesity, and adenoma features with recurrence risk over time in a large longitudinal surveillance cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included adults who underwent their first colonoscopic polypectomy between January 1990 and July 2024 at a tertiary medical center. Exposures: Demographic variables included race and ethnicity, sex, obesity (body mass index >30), family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyps, and age at adenoma onset (<50 vs ≥50 years). Adenoma features included histology, size, number, and dysplasia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, defined as time from initial polypectomy to histologically confirmed recurrence. Time-varying coefficient Cox models were fitted to handle the nonconstant associations of exposure over the follow-up time. The follow-up time was categorized into 3 periods (less than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, and 10 or more years). The heterogeneity of exposure associations across the 3 follow-up periods was assessed with likelihood ratio tests. Results: Among 59 667 patients (mean [SD] age, 60 years [11.2]; 29 401 [49.3%] female; 1007 [1.7%] Asian and Pacific Islander, 646 [1.1%] Hispanic, 5972 [10.0%] non-Hispanic Black, and 52 042 [87.2%] non-Hispanic White; median [IQR] follow-up, 4 [1-9] years), 17 596 (29.5%) experienced overall recurrence within 5 years. High-grade dysplasia demonstrated the largest early phase association (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.00; 95% CI, 3.56-4.50) with complete midterm and late attenuation, while villous histology exhibited biphasic patterns with early elevation (aHR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.63-3.18) and late-phase (>10 years) reemergence (aHR, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.15-3.41). Obesity conferred persistent risk across all surveillance intervals (early: aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.21; late: aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.35). Female patients with high-risk adenomas exhibited marked late-term (>10 years) elevation exceeding male patients (female patients: aHR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.43-2.08 vs male patients: aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.06-1.58). Conclusions and Relevance: Both histopathologic features and demographic factors demonstrated distinct time-dependent patterns in adenoma recurrence, underscoring the need for surveillance strategies that account for temporal variation and population-specific risk profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.