Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41637038›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026

Dialysis Research at Crossroads of Immigration Policy.

Mariana Murea, Samir C Gautam, Lilia Cervantes

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana MureaWake Forest University, Winston-Salem, USA. mariana.murea@advocatehealth.org.
Samir C GautamJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Lilia CervantesUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undocumented immigrants experience profound disparities in access to life-sustaining kidney dialysis care due to exclusion from federal insurance programs. In most states, these individuals receive dialysis only under emergency conditions, a practice associated with higher mortality, increased hospitalizations, and significant psychosocial burden compared to scheduled outpatient dialysis. Immigration policy volatility further complicates care delivery and introduces unique challenges for clinical research involving this population. We examine the intersection of immigration policy, dialysis access, and research ethics in the current political climate in the United States, highlighting how systemic barriers and fear of deportation contribute to underrepresentation of undocumented patients in clinical trials. We review current policy frameworks, summarize evidence on health outcomes under emergency-only dialysis, and propose strategies to maintain scientific rigor and equity in research during periods of policy instability.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.