ArticleGeroScience2026
Explainable AI reveals temporal risk pathways in fall prediction: Extracting clinical insights from multi-horizon machine learning models.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls are a leading cause of injury in older adults, making risk prediction a clinical priority. While many machine learning (ML) models exist, they typically provide a static assessment, predicting risk for a single, fixed timeframe. This approach overlooks how the clinical drivers of risk evolve over time, failing to distinguish between acute factors that signal an imminent fall and chronic conditions that confer long-term vulnerability. This study uses an explainable ML framework across multiple time horizons to unlock deeper clinical insights into the temporal nature of fall risk. We conducted a retrospective, matched case-control study using electronic health record (EHR) data from 99,078 patients who fell and 99,078 matched controls. Seven ML models were trained to predict fall risk across seven distinct prediction windows (3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months). The best-performing model for each horizon, consistently XGBoost, was interpreted using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to identify how the importance of clinical and demographic predictors changed over time. A clear performance trade-off emerged across time horizons. Short-term models (3-12 months) delivered balanced discrimination (best model XGBoost, AUC ≈ 0.75), while long-term models became progressively better at identifying eventual fallers (recall ≈ 80% at 60 months) at the cost of lower specificity (≈ 46%). SHAP analysis revealed distinct temporal patterns: short-term risk was driven by acute conditions like syncope, respiratory symptoms, and urinary tract infections, while long-term risk was predicted by chronic, cumulative factors such as spondylopathies, nutritional deficiencies, and benign neoplasms. Three primary risk trajectories (increasing, steady, and decreasing) were identified, each corresponding to distinct underlying clinical profiles. Fall risk is a dynamic process, not a static state. By analyzing risk across multiple timeframes, we can distinguish between acute triggers requiring immediate intervention and chronic vulnerabilities demanding long-term management. This multi-horizon framework provides a data-driven foundation for a new paradigm in fall prevention: moving beyond generic "high-risk" labels to personalized, temporally aware strategies that align the type and timing of interventions with the specific nature of a patient's evolving risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.