ArticleAMB Express2026
Repurposed bunamidine disrupts envelope energetics and induces ROS-mediated non-lytic killing.
Article in AMB Express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a major public health threat due to its multidrug resistance, biofilm formation, and persistence, which collectively limit the effectiveness of current antibiotics. Here we characterize bunamidine hydrochloride (BUN), a repurposed benzimidazole derivative, as a potent anti-MRSA candidate. Across clinical and reference isolates, BUN displayed low MIC/MBC values (4–8 μg/mL), rapid bactericidal activity, and consistent efficacy in both planktonic and biofilm-associated populations. BUN eradicated persister cells within hours, while exhibiting a markedly reduced propensity for resistance development compared with ciprofloxacin. Mechanistic analyses revealed that BUN disrupts envelope energetics—causing membrane depolarization, collapse of the proton motive force, ATP depletion, and lipid disorder—without pore formation. These events triggered amplification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which acted as critical execution factors for bacterial killing. Hemolysis assays confirmed selective compatibility with mammalian membranes, consistent with a non-lytic mode of action. In murine abscess and wound infection models, which represent early acute infection stages rather than established biofilm or chronic conditions, topical BUN treatment reduced bacterial burden, accelerated wound closure, and alleviated inflammation without apparent toxicity. These results demonstrate early therapeutic efficacy, tissue-protective, and anti-inflammatory effects in acute infection settings. While the current in vivo models support antibacterial efficacy during early infection, evaluation in established biofilm or chronic infection models will be an important direction for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.