ArticleOral radiology2026
Enhancing diagnostic quality in dental bitewings using transformer and GAN-Based image restoration.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeBitewing radiographs have high diagnostic value in detecting interproximal caries and assessing alveolar bone levels. However, image compression and sensor limitations may compromise image quality and diagnostic value. This study investigates whether two advanced deep-learning methods-a Real-Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (Real-ESRGAN) and a Swin Transformer-based image restoration network (SwinIR)-can effectively reconstruct clinically practical details from degraded bitewing images. MATERIALS AND
methodsA curated dataset of 4,004 high-quality bitewing radiographs was downsampled to produce paired low- and high-resolution images. Both deep-learning methods were fine-tuned using identical training protocols. Image quality was evaluated using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM). Additionally, a blinded panel of twelve dentists assessed anatomic clarity, diagnostic accuracy, and perceptual realism using a descriptive rating scale.
resultsThe SwinIR achieved superior quantitative results, with a PSNR of 35.56 dB and a SSIM of 0.9287, outperforming Real-ESRGAN, which recorded 31.93 dB and 0.8227, respectively. Clinicians also favored SwinIR for its ability to preserve diagnostic structures such as tooth margins and trabecular patterns, whereas Real-ESRGAN was favored for its perceptual realism and smoother texture rendering.
conclusionFor bitewing radiographs, the Swin Transformer-based super-resolution model demonstrated more faithful preservation of clinically important structures than Real-ESRGAN, making it the preferred choice when diagnostic precision is prioritized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41637018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.