Trial reportOdontology2026
Evaluation of the analgesic effect of sublingual administration of wheatgrass (Triticum aestivum) extract for dental pain management in irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the analgesic effectiveness of sublingual administration of wheatgrass (WG) and piroxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), for patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, with or without apical periodontitis. Forty-five patients aged 18-40 years were recruited and randomly allocated into three groups receiving the sublingual drug administration: Group 1-WG (500 mg); Group 2-Piroxicam (20 mg); Group 3-Placebo sugar tablet (20 mg) (control). Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0-10) prior to administration and again 30 min after the respective interventions. The onset of analgesic action was also recorded for each participant. Statistical comparisons among the groups were conducted using one-way ANOVA with the significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Both sublingual WG and piroxicam demonstrated significantly greater reductions in pain scores compared with the placebo group after 30 min. Notably, participants receiving WG exhibited a significantly higher degree of pain reduction than those receiving piroxicam. These findings suggest that WG may offer a rapid and effective analgesic response when administered sublingually. Given its natural origin, WG may serve as a promising adjunct or alternative to conventional NSAIDs for the short-term management of acute dental pain associated with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.Trial registration: This clinical trial was prospectively registered in Clinical Trial Registry of India under the registration number of CTRI/2024/12/078719 dated on 30/12/2024 ( https://www.ctri.nic.in/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41636988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.