ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Lineage plasticity: a new dilemma in lung cancer treatment.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lineage plasticity, the ability of cancer cells to switch lineages, is an emerging and critical mechanism of therapy resistance in lung cancer, posing a major obstacle to durable treatment responses. This review synthesizes the latest clinical and mechanistic advances to provide an integrated framework for understanding this phenomenon. We first explore the cellular origins and the “lineage-sharing” hypothesis, explaining how distinct histologic subtypes can arise from overlapping progenitor compartments. We then delineate how therapeutic pressure, through intratumoral competition and epigenetic reprogramming, drives the selection and expansion of resistant clones manifesting as histologic transformation (e.g., NSCLC to SCLC, adenocarcinoma-to-squamous) or phenotypic switching (e.g., within SCLC). A dedicated analysis dissects the core molecular networks, centered on EGFR, KRAS, TP53/RB1, MYC, and SOX2, that orchestrate these lineage changes. Crucially, we highlight the direct clinical implications of plasticity, linking it to aggressive disease progression and poor patient outcomes. Finally, we discuss persistent challenges and future perspectives, emphasizing the need for biomarkers for early detection and novel therapeutic strategies aimed at constraining plasticity to overcome resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41636935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.