ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
The genetic aetiology of male infertility: clinical and forensic implications.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating prevalence of infertility on a global scale represents a critical public concern, with over 50% cases attributed to male-related factors. Y chromosome microdeletion, within the azoospermia factor region, has emerged as a significant genetic contributor to male infertility, with its occurrence varying from 2% to 24% based on the geographic location and genetic background. The prevalence of such microdeletions in infertile individuals varies broadly, with AZFc being the most frequently reported deletion. The gr/gr partial deletion demonstrates a significant ethnic correlation, highlighting the genetic and demographic factors that may influence microdeletions in the AZF region. Reports also indicate significant geographical variation, with eastern and southern areas exhibiting higher prevalence, in contrast to Europe and Australia. In the Clinical aspect, the deletion is a reliable diagnostic tool for identifying infertility and its genetic causes, making it essential for accurate diagnosis and genetic counselling. Moreover, this review addresses challenges associated with the complex Y-Short Tandem Repeat profile interpretation, as well as their potential implication in forensic and medical genetics. The key focus is to investigate the uniparental inheritance of the Y chromosome, its importance in tracing the male lineage, identification of perpetrators in sexual assault cases, and in investigative genetic genealogy. However, the deletion results in an atypical profile pattern, thereby necessitating careful validation strategies to prevent interpretational errors in forensic and kinship analysis. In conclusion, establishing a standardised screening protocol, a unified testing threshold, and centralising the genetic database are essential for improving health management and forensic justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41636934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.