ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Parsley, pints, and potions: unraveling patient errors in kidney stone care.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDespite evidence-based preventive strategies for urolithiasis, patient adherence remains low, partly due to misconceptions about non-evidence-based remedies. This study aims to quantify the prevalence of these misconceptions. PATIENTS AND
methodsAn internet-based questionnaire was distributed to adults with a self-reported history of kidney stones. The survey assessed beliefs in beer apple cider vinegar and parsley as preventive agents. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to evaluate associations between misconceptions, demographic factors, and adherence.
resultsAmong 100 adults with self-reported kidney stones who completed the online questionnaire, 50% believed that drinking beer prevents kidney stones, 52% endorsed parsley consumption, and 17% believed in apple cider vinegar as protective agents. Misconceptions about beer or parsley were marginally associated with younger age (OR 0.75 per higher age category, 95% CI 0.55–1.02, p = 0.069), but not significantly linked to gender, family history, obesity, or surgical history. Participants holding these misconceptions demonstrated modestly lower adherence to evidence-based practices, including medication compliance (71.4% vs. 75.0%) and completion of metabolic evaluation (70.3% vs. 75.0%), though differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
conclusionsMisconceptions about beer, parsley, and apple cider vinegar as kidney stone preventive agents are prevalent among patients with urolithiasis, with a trend toward higher rates in younger individuals, and may undermine adherence to evidence-based strategies despite non-significant differences observed. Targeted educational interventions are needed to address these myths, particularly in populations relying on non-scientific sources. This study highlights the utility of internet-based surveys in identifying barriers to urolithiasis prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41636911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.