ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Mesh repair versus anatomical repair of ruptured umbilical hernia in cirrhotic patients, our center experience.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRuptured umbilical hernia (UH) is a life-threatening condition in cirrhotic patients with a morbidity and mortality rate of 30%. Despite its high risk, the best surgical treatment strategy for this condition remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of mesh repair of ruptured UH.
methods149 patients who underwent surgical management for ruptured UH between January 2018 and December 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups: anatomical repair (group 1, n = 92) and mesh repair (group 2, n = 57). Hernia recurrence, wound infection, and other perioperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated.
resultsThe recurrence of hernia was significantly lower after mesh repair (5.3% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.03). Other postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the incidence of wound infection after mesh repair was higher than that after anatomical repair, but this was statistically non-significant (12.3% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.48). Two patients in the mesh repair group required mesh removal due to infection.
conclusionsMesh repair of ruptured UH in cirrhotic patients is a feasible and safe surgical option that results in a significantly lower hernia recurrence rate with acceptable morbidity and mortality, provided that careful patient optimization is carried out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41636907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.