Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41636834›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Shaping the future of myopia: artificial intelligence for vitreoretinal complications of high and pathologic myopia.

Yeabsira Mesfin, Anish Salvi, Leo Arnal, Curtis Langlotz, Vinit Mahajan, Chase A Ludwig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yeabsira MesfinSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, US.
Anish SalviSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, US.
Leo ArnalSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, US.
Curtis LanglotzSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, US.
Vinit MahajanSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, US.
Chase A LudwigSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, US. caludwig@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9586-3735

Funding

E. Matilda Ziegler Foundation for the Blind E. Matilda Ziegler Foundation for the BlindNational Eye Institute K23 Grant K23EY035741Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc Research to Prevent Blindness, IncStanford P30 Vision Research Core Grant NEI P30-EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe global impact of myopia extends far beyond individual ocular health, posing significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL) applied to ophthalmic imaging, offers a promising strategy to ease constraints posed by the myopia epidemic by detecting subtle structural changes early. Here we describe the current literature on AI for detecting retinal sequelae of myopia, including retinal detachments (RD), myopic macular degeneration (MMD), and myopic traction maculopathy (MTM), with attention to imaging modality and model task (classification vs. segmentation).

methodsA literature search was conducted to identify studies using DL to detect RD, MMD, and MTM across ophthalmic imaging modalities (including OCT and fundus photography, and where available fluorescein angiography and ultrasonography). RESULTS/

findingsWe reviewed 28 studies that piloted DL models usingclassification and/or segmentation approaches for RD (10 studies), MMD (12 studies), and MTM (6 studies). Reported performance for RD ranged from area under the curve (AUC) 86-100%, accuracy 79.3-98.9%, sensitivity 77.1-97.6%, and specificity 79.7-100%. For MMD, performance ranged from AUC 86-100%, accuracy 85.3-99.8%, sensitivity 37.1-97.8%, and specificity 91.5-99.9%. For MTM, performance ranged from AUC 93.8-99.7%, accuracy 94.3-99.3%, sensitivity 74.5-98.4%, and specificity 84.8-99.7%. Across studies, there was substantial heterogeneity in case definitions, datasets, and evaluation methods, and external validation was inconsistently reported. Many earlier studies used CNN-based architectures, while more recent work increasingly incorporates transformer-based backbones and pretrained or foundation models.

conclusionResearchers have demonstrated excellent results for developing DL models that accurately classify and segment retinal pathologies associated with myopia. However, despite strong performance, additional work is needed to translate these models into clinical use, including robust external validation, calibration for clinical decision-making, and prospective evaluation, particularly for longitudinal prognostication of incident complications in pathologic myopia.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningMyopia, DegenerativeRetinal DetachmentRetinal DiseasesForecastingHumansTomography, Optical CoherenceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMyopiaMyopic macular degenerationMyopic traction maculopathyPathologic myopiaRetinal detachment

Identifiers

PMID41636834
PMCPMC13091850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.