Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41636817›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Two-group interlandmark distance analysis for skeletal sex estimation using resampling and posterior probability contour plots.

Stefan Schlager, Daniel Franklin, Marco Milella, Andrea Cardini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan SchlagerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Daniel FranklinCentre for Forensic Anthropology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Marco MilellaDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Pisa, Via Derna, 1, Pisa, 56126, Italy.
Andrea CardiniCentre for Forensic Anthropology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. alcardini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-632X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attribution of taxonomic and/or demographic parameters based on the analysis of interlandmark linear measurements remains a widely used approach in both anthropology and zoology, despite the availability of more sophisticated techniques. Especially in forensic contexts, linear measurements are commonly employed for the estimation of sex and/or ancestry to facilitate identification. In the present study we evaluate the potential of applying a resampling-based approach that uses a newly developed R function to efficiently compute interlandmark distances from their Cartesian coordinates and allows identification of which distances are robustly associated with a biological factor; specifically sex. Following the identification of significant dimorphic measurements, we evaluate their associated sex classification accuracy. Furthermore, we demonstrate how results from a training dataset can be applied to novel cases using a rarely implemented, yet straightforward and effective, graphical method. When limited to two variables, this technique involves generating a scatterplot overlaid with interpolated contour lines representing posterior probabilities. By plotting new observations within this data space, users can visually classify sex and its associated probability, without requirement for further computation, analogous to how elevation is estimated on a topographic map using contour lines. We discuss the advantages and limitations of this novel approach and its statistical reproducibility. Broader application of this method could enhance understanding of population specificity in sexually dimorphic cranial measurements and support the development of contour-based tools for the rapid and accurate estimation of skeletal sex in unidentified human remains.

Indexed as

Sex Determination by SkeletonSkullFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleProbabilityReproducibility of ResultsAnthropologyBootstrapDiscriminant analysisForensicsHuman populationSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID41636817
PMCPMC13161249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.