ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Two-group interlandmark distance analysis for skeletal sex estimation using resampling and posterior probability contour plots.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The attribution of taxonomic and/or demographic parameters based on the analysis of interlandmark linear measurements remains a widely used approach in both anthropology and zoology, despite the availability of more sophisticated techniques. Especially in forensic contexts, linear measurements are commonly employed for the estimation of sex and/or ancestry to facilitate identification. In the present study we evaluate the potential of applying a resampling-based approach that uses a newly developed R function to efficiently compute interlandmark distances from their Cartesian coordinates and allows identification of which distances are robustly associated with a biological factor; specifically sex. Following the identification of significant dimorphic measurements, we evaluate their associated sex classification accuracy. Furthermore, we demonstrate how results from a training dataset can be applied to novel cases using a rarely implemented, yet straightforward and effective, graphical method. When limited to two variables, this technique involves generating a scatterplot overlaid with interpolated contour lines representing posterior probabilities. By plotting new observations within this data space, users can visually classify sex and its associated probability, without requirement for further computation, analogous to how elevation is estimated on a topographic map using contour lines. We discuss the advantages and limitations of this novel approach and its statistical reproducibility. Broader application of this method could enhance understanding of population specificity in sexually dimorphic cranial measurements and support the development of contour-based tools for the rapid and accurate estimation of skeletal sex in unidentified human remains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.