ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
[Evaluation and clinical management of interstitial lung abnormalities : Position paper of the Austrian Society of Pneumology (ÖGP) and the Austrian Radiological Society (ÖRG) 2026].
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are findings detected on computed tomography (CT) that potentially reflect early stages of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Their prevalence ranges between 3-10% in the general population, with higher rates observed in older individuals and smokers. ILA include bilateral and nonhypostasis-related ground-glass opacities, reticular abnormalities, traction bronchiectasis, lung architectural distortion and honeycombing, affecting more than 5% of a lung zone. The risk of progression to ILD varies between 20-80%, depending on the ILA subtype and associated risk factors. Clinical progression and risk factors include advanced age, nicotine exposure, inhaled noxious substances, thoracic surgical procedures, pneumotoxic treatment and abnormal pulmonary function parameters. Radiologically, fibrotic ILA with subpleural and basal predominance as well as larger extent of lung involvement are significantly associated with increased risk of progression. The clinical management is based on a structured evaluation including high-resolution CT, lung function diagnostics and risk stratification. In the absence of signs of advanced fibrotic changes, individualized follow-up intervals ranging from 6-36 months are recommended, depending on the patient's risk profile. This position paper provides practical recommendations for managing ILA, in line with current international guidelines, while considering new evidence on genetic risk factors, imaging features associated with progression and clinical predictors. The aim is an early identification of high-risk patients and avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic or therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.