ArticleInternational health2026
An innovative concept of using community information for surveys and developing a map of Simulium breeding sites.
Article in International health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why we need medical entomologists more than ever.International health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHaving a Simulium vector distribution map is important for all entomological and epidemiological aspects for the elimination of onchocerciasis. Developing these maps using topographic maps has some limitations such as identifying the exact locations of rapids, especially with low-scale maps. This leads to breeding sites being missed during prospecting. Recent efforts to map breeding sites involve the development of technologies such as satellite images, remote sensing modelling and drones. The limitations of these technologies include cost, security concerns and tree cover preventing the observation of rapids from the sky. Although community support has traditionally been used to guide entomological teams during prospecting for breeding sites, community knowledge has not been an integral part in planning breeding site surveys.
methodsThis article proposes a concept of using community knowledge and health system structure for planning and implementation of breeding sites surveys. The approach uses questionnaires to gather information on fast-flowing stretches of rivers within communities. Using this information, a breeding site survey plan is developed at the national level and reviewed and implemented at the district and subdistrict levels using discussions, photos and videos of fast flowing rivers, as well as topographic maps. A working timetable is then developed that indicates areas to visit each day, maximizing time in the field and other logistics.
conclusionsUsing health system structures and community members not only provides a rapid approach for entomological surveys but also strengthens entomological fieldwork and fosters community engagement in vector surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.