ArticleThe Journal of heredity2026
Whole-genome sequences confirm Castilleja lassenensis (Orobanchaceae) as a distinct species from Castilleja lemmonii.
Article in The Journal of heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomes of Conopholis americana and Epifagus virginiana: two holoparasitic plants (Orobanchaceae).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Castilleja lassenensis, a species of root-parasitic plants endemic to the Mt. Lassen region in northern California, has been subject to taxonomic debate since its first description in 1940. While morphological and ecological distinctions from its close relative Castilleja lemmonii have been documented, many regional floras do not list C. lassenensis or treat it as a synonym of C. lemmonii. We sequenced the nuclear genomes of C. lassenensis and C. lemmonii and performed comparative genomic analyses including gene content, functional enrichment, and phylogenetic placement. The genome of C. lassenensis, although slightly smaller than that of C. lemmonii, shows higher gene content, with different patterns of gene duplication. Functional genomic analysis revealed distinct enrichment patterns in the two species, with metabolic and transport functions enriched in C. lassenensis versus cellular organization in C. lemmonii. The taxa also show divergence in peptidase and CAZyme distributions, as well as in KAI2d proteins involved in strigolactone perception. Population-level validation using diagnostic gene markers across multiple individuals from geographically separate populations confirmed stable genomic differences. Our results support the recognition of C. lassenensis as a distinct species and underscore the need for measures to ensure its conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.